Our new study suggests that parents with learning disabilities or learning difficulties whose babies are involved in care proceedings are often missing the chance to access and meaningfully engage in pre-birth services that might help them to develop or prove their parenting abilities. Their disabilities or difficulties are often not being identified until cases reach court, and so support has not been adapted for their needs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The report<\/a> was published on Wednesday 12 June and IPC Assistant Director Katy Burch<\/a> and lawyer Reagan Persaud explained the key findings to Clare McDonnell on BBC Woman’s Hour<\/a>.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n For this Nuffield Family Justice Observatory commissioned study, researchers at the Institute of Public Care examined 200 care proceedings cases involving babies (children under one year old) across four different local authority areas, and interviewed professionals and parents. They found that in one third (34%) of the cases one or more of the parents involved had learning disabilities or learning difficulties. This prevalence varied by local authority area (from 44% in a county area to 22% in a London borough) \u2013 consistent with Public Health England evidence on the varying rates of adults with learning disabilities within the whole population across different parts of England.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Despite this prevalence \u2013 and despite a high proportion (81%) of babies having been referred to children\u2019s social care during their mother\u2019s pregnancy, most in the first and second trimester \u2013 in approximately three quarters of the reviewed children\u2019s case files, parents\u2019 learning disabilities or learning difficulties had not been identified until their cases reached court. Professionals of all types interviewed as part of the study thought this was far too late and that there were missed opportunities to identify learning disabilities or learning difficulties at an earlier stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The study also suggested that parents are often already known to services. Nearly half (49%) of the mothers and 28% of the fathers were known to have older children already in care. Just over half (51%) of the mothers and just under a quarter (24%) of the fathers were known to have been in care or to have been the subject of a statutory child protection or child in need plan themselves as children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n All public bodies, including local authorities and courts, are required to make reasonable adjustments to ensure that people with disabilities are not put at a substantial disadvantage (Section 20 Equality Act, 2010). Late identification of parental learning disabilities or learning difficulties mean that key parenting assessments and parenting support services are very unlikely to be tailored to parents\u2019 learning needs. The professionals interviewed considered that in these circumstances parents were less likely to be engaged effectively in pre-proceedings work, resources would be wasted and care proceedings might also be delayed (in the cases analysed, the average length of proceedings was 39 weeks and, in 76% of cases, the proceedings needed to be extended beyond 26 weeks).<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the cases examined, parenting support was very inconsistently or insufficiently adjusted for parents with learning disabilities or learning difficulties, particularly in cases involving pre-birth work with parents \u2013 such as how to develop or maintain healthy relationships, emotional stability, baby attachment, baby brain development, or making practical preparations for the baby\u2019s arrival. While there was much more evidence that adjustments were being made within actual care proceedings, it was usually only after a cognitive assessment and\/or court intermediary assessment had been undertaken, which meant they often only helped parents at a final hearing stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The main barriers to earlier identification included the costs for local authorities in getting an assessment completed earlier and social workers not having the right training, experience, authority, or time to screen effectively or to trigger a further in-depth assessment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n